Excipients » Cellulose derivatives » Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC)
Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC) in Pharmaceuticals: Properties, Variability and Characterization
Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is one of the most widely used excipients in pharmaceutical solid dosage forms and is generally considered a chemically stable and relatively inert material. However, pharmaceutical MCC is not necessarily chemically inert toward every active pharmaceutical ingredient. Low levels of residual carbohydrates, reducing groups, oxidized cellulose structures and process-related degradation products may contribute to API–excipient interactions in susceptible formulations.
These reactive components can vary between MCC grades, batches and suppliers and are not necessarily fully characterized by routine pharmacopoeial testing. Their presence may become particularly important when unexplained degradation is observed during drug product stability studies or when a change in MCC source coincides with a change in stability or product performance.
Excipia specializes in the characterization of such excipient-related variability and reactivity. By investigating MCC beyond routine compendial specifications, differences in reactive components, residual carbohydrates, degradation products and other material attributes can be identified and evaluated in relation to drug product stability and performance.
What is MCC?
Microcrystalline cellulose is a purified, partially depolymerized form of cellulose. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide consisting of β-(1→4)-linked D-glucose units and is the principal structural component of plant cell walls. Pharmaceutical MCC is generally produced from highly purified α-cellulose by controlled hydrolysis. During hydrolysis, the more accessible amorphous regions of cellulose are preferentially hydrolysed, resulting in partially depolymerized cellulose with a characteristic semi-crystalline structure.
MCC is practically insoluble in water and most common organic solvents. Its combination of particle structure, porosity, surface characteristics and extensive hydrogen bonding contributes to its useful pharmaceutical processing and compaction properties.
Microcrystalline Cellulose Characterization Services
Excipia offers fast and flexible hands-on services to reveal and compare hidden microcrystalline cellulose properties like :
the presence of potential reactive impurities or functional groups, degradation products and related substances, just like molecular weight distributions and many other featured characteristics.
In addition, we can help users of MCC to pick the most appropriate microcrystalline cellulose manufacturer, select the most suitable microcrystalline cellulose grade for their finished dosage form, or define customized microcrystalline cellulose specifications to control product performance, quality and safety.
MCC Structure and Pharmaceutical Properties
Cellulose chains contain numerous hydroxyl groups capable of forming intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds. These interactions contribute to the organization of cellulose into more ordered crystalline regions and less ordered amorphous regions. Controlled hydrolysis preferentially affects the more accessible regions of cellulose. The resulting MCC retains a semi-crystalline, porous particulate structure whose characteristics depend on the cellulose source and manufacturing process.
Properties such as degree of polymerization, crystallinity, porosity, moisture content, particle-size distribution and particle morphology can influence how MCC behaves during pharmaceutical processing.
The structure of MCC is therefore not only of chemical interest. Differences in structural and physical properties can become relevant to blending, granulation, compression and the performance of the resulting dosage form.
Pharmaceutical Applications of Microcrystalline Cellulose
MCC is widely used in tablets and capsules and is particularly valuable in direct-compression formulations. Depending on the formulation and grade, it can function as a filler or diluent, dry binder, compression aid, disintegration-supporting excipient, and carrier for low-dose active pharmaceutical ingredients.
MCC exhibits good compactability because its particles undergo substantial plastic deformation during compression. This promotes particle-to-particle contact and contributes to the formation of mechanically strong tablets.
Different applications may, however, place different requirements on the physical and chemical characteristics of MCC. A material suitable for one formulation or manufacturing process is therefore not necessarily interchangeable with another MCC grade without appropriate evaluation.
Why Can MCC Grades and Suppliers Differ?
Commercial MCC is available in numerous grades with different particle-size distributions, bulk densities and processing characteristics.
Variability between MCC materials can arise from differences in:
- botanical and cellulose raw-material source;
- cellulose purification;
- hydrolysis conditions;
- degree of polymerization;
- drying and milling processes;
- particle-size distribution;
- particle morphology and porosity;
- bulk and tapped density;
- moisture content and moisture sorption;
- crystallinity;
- residual hemicellulose-derived components;
- low-level reactive or degradation products.
Consequently, two MCC materials may comply with the same pharmacopoeial monograph while still differing in material attributes relevant to a particular pharmaceutical formulation.
Why Does MCC Variability Matter in Drug Products?
Not every measurable difference between MCC materials is pharmaceutically relevant. The importance of a particular material attribute depends on the function of MCC in the formulation, the manufacturing process and the properties and chemical sensitivity of the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Physical differences between MCC grades, batches or suppliers can influence powder flow, blending and granulation behaviour, compactability, tablet hardness, friability, porosity and disintegration. Depending on the formulation, these differences may subsequently contribute to changes in drug dissolution or manufacturing performance. MCC variability can also have a chemical dimension. Although MCC is generally regarded as a stable and relatively inert pharmaceutical excipient, it may contain low levels of residual carbohydrates, reducing groups, oxidized cellulose structures and process-related degradation products. The type and level of these components can vary with raw-material source and manufacturing history. For most formulations, such low-level components may have no meaningful effect. However, in combination with a chemically sensitive API, reactive components in MCC can potentially contribute to API–excipient interactions and degradation. Their relevance may only become apparent during drug product stability studies, for example when unexpected degradation is observed or when apparently comparable MCC grades, batches or suppliers result in different stability behaviour.
MCC variability should therefore be considered from both a functional and a chemical perspective. Two materials that comply with the same pharmacopoeial requirements may still differ in attributes affecting manufacturing, drug product performance or API stability. Determining whether such differences are relevant requires characterization targeted to the specific formulation and problem being investigated.
MCC composition and production
The production of microcrystalline cellulose from wood-derived cellulose has been established for more than 70 years. Wood is a complex lignocellulosic material consisting primarily of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Depending on the botanical source, lignin typically accounts for approximately 18–35% of wood, while cellulose and hemicelluloses together constitute the majority of the remaining material. Lignin is a complex phenolic polymer composed of differently linked phenylpropane-derived units. Together with cellulose and hemicellulose, it contributes to the structural integrity of plant cell walls. Its relatively hydrophobic character also contributes to the water-transporting properties of vascular plant tissues. Hemicelluloses are structurally different from cellulose. Whereas cellulose consists of linear chains of β-(1→4)-linked glucose units, hemicelluloses are heterogeneous, generally branched polysaccharides composed of combinations of sugars such as xylose, mannose, glucose, galactose and arabinose, together with uronic acids. Their branched and heterogeneous structure results in a substantially less ordered structure than cellulose.
Botanical Source and Hemicellulose Composition
The composition of hemicellulose depends strongly on the botanical source. Softwoods such as Norway spruce typically contain substantial amounts of galactoglucomannans, composed predominantly of mannose, glucose and galactose. Hardwood hemicelluloses, in contrast, are generally richer in glucuronoxylans, in which xylose forms the principal sugar backbone. These differences are relevant to pharmaceutical MCC because the botanical source and cellulose purification process can leave characteristic residual carbohydrate profiles. Although the majority of hemicellulose is removed during cellulose purification, low levels of hemicellulose-derived components may remain in the resulting material. Residual sugars such as xylose, mannose, glucose, galactose and arabinose can therefore provide analytical information about raw-material source, purification and manufacturing history. Differences in these components can be useful markers when comparing MCC grades, batches or manufacturers. Importantly, residual carbohydrates are not only markers of material origin. Some monosaccharides are reducing sugars and may introduce chemical reactivity that becomes relevant in formulations containing susceptible APIs. The significance depends on their concentration, the API and the formulation environment.
Read our Case Study: VARIABILITY OF EXCIPIENTS: Xylose in microcrystalline cellulose
Figure 2 Xylose, Glucose, Galactose, Arabinose and Mannose in their pyranose form.
From Wood to Purified Cellulose
Manufacture of wood-derived MCC begins with separation and purification of cellulose from the lignocellulosic raw material. Wood is mechanically reduced in size and subjected to pulping to remove lignin and a substantial proportion of the hemicelluloses. Different pulping processes can be used. In Kraft pulping, alkaline conditions involving sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide are used to break down and solubilize lignin structures. Sulfite-based processes use sulfur-containing reagents to facilitate lignin removal. Subsequent alkaline extraction and washing steps can further reduce residual hemicellulose and other non-cellulosic components. The exact pulping and purification processes used by MCC manufacturers may differ. Raw-material selection, chemical treatments, temperature, pH, washing and purification therefore contribute to the manufacturing history of the cellulose from which MCC is produced. These processing steps are important not only because they determine the purity of the cellulose. Exposure of carbohydrates to acidic, alkaline, oxidative and thermal conditions can also influence their chemical composition and contribute to the formation or removal of low-level degradation products and reactive functionalities.
From Purified Cellulose to Microcrystalline Cellulose
Purified α-cellulose is subsequently subjected to controlled hydrolysis, commonly under acidic conditions. Cellulose contains both more ordered crystalline regions and less ordered, more accessible regions. Hydrolysis preferentially attacks the accessible regions and reduces the degree of polymerization until a characteristic partially depolymerized cellulose structure is obtained. Following hydrolysis, soluble degradation products and other soluble components are removed by washing. The remaining cellulose is separated, further washed and processed into the required MCC grade. Drying and particle-processing conditions are important determinants of the final physical properties. Spray drying is commonly used in MCC manufacture and can influence particle aggregation, morphology, porosity, bulk density, particle-size distribution and powder behaviour. The final properties of MCC are therefore determined by several consecutive stages: botanical source, pulping, cellulose purification, hydrolysis, washing, drying and particle processing. Manufacturers can vary these processes to produce MCC grades with different functional characteristics.
Manufacturing History and Pharmaceutical Variability
Differences in raw-material source and manufacturing conditions can influence both the physical functionality and chemical composition of MCC. Physical differences may include degree of polymerization, particle size and morphology, porosity, bulk density, crystallinity and moisture behaviour. These characteristics can affect powder processing, compactability, tablet properties and other aspects of drug product manufacture. At the same time, differences in raw material and processing history can influence residual hemicellulose-derived carbohydrates, reducing sugars, oxidized cellulose structures and process-related degradation products. These low-level components may not be fully characterized by routine pharmacopoeial testing. For many pharmaceutical formulations, such differences will have no meaningful impact. However, when a chemically sensitive API is involved, differences that appear minor from an excipient specification perspective may become important during drug product stability studies. Understanding how MCC is produced therefore provides an important basis for understanding why nominally equivalent MCC grades, batches or suppliers can differ and why targeted characterization beyond routine compendial testing may sometimes be necessary.
MCC Reactivity, Reactive Components and Drug Product Stability
Microcrystalline cellulose is generally regarded as a chemically stable and relatively inert pharmaceutical excipient. However, this does not mean that every MCC material is chemically inert toward every active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). In formulations containing a susceptible drug substance, relatively small differences in the chemical composition, surface properties or moisture behaviour of MCC may become relevant to drug product stability. This is particularly important because the attributes responsible for an API–excipient interaction may not be part of routine pharmacopoeial specifications. Two MCC materials can therefore comply with the same pharmacopoeial requirements while differing in low-level characteristics that influence the stability of a particular API.
Why MCC Reactivity May Only Become Apparent During Stability Studies
The presence of residual sugars, oxidized cellulose structures, organic acids, reactive carbonyl compounds or other low-level components does not mean that an MCC material is unsuitable for pharmaceutical use. MCC has a long history of successful pharmaceutical application and, for most formulations, these components will have no meaningful effect. Problems can arise when the chemical sensitivity of a particular API intersects with a specific material attribute of the excipient. An API–MCC interaction may therefore only become apparent after weeks or months of storage, particularly under elevated temperature or humidity. The first indication may be an unexpected increase in a degradation product, discoloration, a change in impurity profile or a difference in stability between otherwise comparable drug product batches. Different MCC grades, batches or suppliers may also behave differently. Consequently, when unexplained API degradation is observed during stability studies, or when stability changes following a change in MCC grade or supplier, excipient-related reactivity should be considered as one of the potential contributing factors.
Residual Carbohydrates and Reducing Components
Depending on the botanical source and manufacturing history, MCC may contain low levels of residual hemicellulose-derived carbohydrates and other reducing components. Residual sugars such as glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose and arabinose can originate from the lignocellulosic raw material and its subsequent purification and hydrolysis. Reducing sugars contain, or can generate, reactive carbonyl functionality. Reducing cellulose chain ends can provide similar functionality. Although these components may be present only at low levels, they can become relevant when the API contains susceptible functional groups. A well-known example is Maillard-type chemistry between reducing carbohydrates and compounds containing suitable amino groups. Such reactions can result in the formation of drug–excipient interaction products, discoloration and, depending on the system, secondary degradation reactions. Susceptibility depends not only on the concentration of reducing components, but also on API structure, temperature, moisture and the degree of physical contact between API and excipient. This illustrates an important principle in excipient compatibility: the chemical behaviour of an MCC material towards a particular API may be influenced by low-level components rather than by the bulk cellulose itself.
Oxidized Cellulose and Reactive Functional Groups
Cellulose can undergo oxidation during raw-material processing, purification, manufacture or subsequent handling. Oxidation of hydroxyl groups within the glucose units can introduce carbonyl and carboxyl functionalities, resulting in oxidized cellulose structures commonly referred to as oxycellulose. The chemistry of oxidized cellulose is complex because oxidation can occur at different positions within the glucose units and may be accompanied by cleavage or degradation of the cellulose backbone. Oxycellulose therefore represents a range of chemically modified cellulose structures rather than a single defined impurity. From a pharmaceutical perspective, the introduction of carbonyl and other reactive functional groups is particularly relevant because it can alter the chemical reactivity of the excipient. The amount and nature of oxidized cellulose can depend on the raw material, purification process, exposure to oxidizing conditions and subsequent storage. Differences in oxidative history may therefore contribute to chemical variability between MCC grades, batches and suppliers.
Low-Molecular-Weight Degradation Products
The acidic, alkaline, oxidative and thermal conditions encountered during cellulose purification and MCC manufacture can also promote carbohydrate degradation. Depending on the processing conditions, degradation products may include low-molecular-weight organic acids, such as formic and acetic acid, as well as carbonyl-containing compounds and furan derivatives such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and furfural. These components are chemically different from the high-molecular-weight cellulose itself and may have greater mobility and reactivity within a formulation. Their presence and concentration can depend on raw-material composition, manufacturing conditions and subsequent storage. Low-molecular-weight reactive components can therefore be important even when they represent only a very small fraction of the total excipient. For a chemically sensitive API, drug product stability may be influenced by the concentration of a reactive trace component rather than by the chemical identity of the bulk excipient.
Formic Acid and Formylation Reactions
Formic acid is of particular interest because it can arise from carbohydrate degradation and has been implicated in specific drug–excipient incompatibilities. For drug substances containing susceptible amine functionality, N-formylation can represent a potential degradation pathway. Mechanistic pharmaceutical studies have demonstrated that formic acid generated from MCC or residual reducing carbohydrates can contribute to the formation of N-formyl degradation products under appropriate conditions. This provides a clear example of why detailed excipient characterization can be relevant to stability investigations: the species responsible for an observed degradation pathway may be a low-level reactive component originating from the excipient rather than the major excipient component itself.
Nitrite in microcrystalline cellulose
Nitrite is of particular interest because trace levels may be present in pharmaceutical excipients and can vary between excipient types, suppliers and batches. For drug substances containing susceptible amine functionality, nitrite can act as a source of nitrosating species and thereby contribute to the formation of N-nitrosamines, including nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs), under appropriate conditions. This potential contribution can be relevant even at low nitrite concentrations, particularly for excipients such as MCC that are used at relatively high levels in oral solid dosage forms. This provides another example of why detailed excipient characterization can be relevant to drug-product stability and impurity investigations: a low-level reactive component originating from an excipient may contribute to the formation of a critical degradation product. Trace-level nitrite and nitrate analysis can therefore support nitrosamine risk assessment and the comparison of excipient suppliers and batches.
Moisture as a Driver of MCC-Related Stability
MCC interacts readily with environmental moisture, and the amount and state of water associated with the material can influence drug product stability. Moisture can increase molecular mobility and facilitate the transport of reactive species within a solid formulation. It can also enable hydrolytic or other solution-mediated reactions and influence reactions involving residual sugars, organic acids or other reactive components. Consequently, MCC materials with different moisture contents, moisture sorption behaviour or water-binding characteristics may affect a moisture-sensitive API differently, even when both materials comply with applicable pharmacopoeial requirements. The relationship between MCC and API stability can therefore depend strongly on storage temperature and relative humidity. This helps explain why an incompatibility may not be evident during initial formulation studies but becomes apparent during accelerated or long-term stability testing.
Surface Chemistry and the Local Microenvironment
Bulk measurements do not necessarily describe the chemical environment experienced by an API at the surface of an excipient particle. In a solid dosage form, API and MCC particles can be in intimate contact, creating local microenvironments at the API–excipient interface. Surface acidity, adsorbed water, residual processing components and reactive functional groups may influence this local environment. This can be particularly relevant for APIs susceptible to acid- or base-catalysed degradation. Differences between commercial MCC materials may therefore not always be adequately described by conventional bulk measurements such as aqueous pH. When investigating an API–MCC incompatibility, the chemical characteristics of the excipient surface and the local API–excipient environment may also need to be considered.
Oxidative and Processing-Related Reactivity
Oxidative mechanisms may also be relevant for oxidation-sensitive APIs. Although MCC is not generally considered a major source of peroxide impurities compared with excipients particularly susceptible to autoxidation, oxidative degradation should not automatically be excluded when investigating an unexplained stability problem. Pharmaceutical processing itself may also influence excipient reactivity. Mechanical stress can alter particle surfaces, and mechanically generated radicals associated with MCC have been implicated in API degradation during high-shear processing. Manufacturing history and drug product processing conditions may therefore need to be considered alongside the properties of the starting excipient.
Investigating MCC-Related Drug Product Stability Problems
When MCC is suspected of contributing to API degradation, simply repeating routine pharmacopoeial testing may not identify the underlying cause. The investigation should instead be guided by the chemistry of the API and the observed degradation pathway. For an amine-containing API, residual reducing carbohydrates, reactive carbonyl compounds and organic acids may be particularly relevant. For an oxidation-sensitive API, oxidative species and processing history may require consideration. For a hydrolytically sensitive API, moisture content and moisture sorption behaviour may be more important, while acid- or base-sensitive APIs may require investigation of surface chemistry and the local microenvironment. Targeted characterization may therefore include residual carbohydrate profiling, reducing power, reactive functional groups, oxidized cellulose structures, organic acids and other degradation products, together with relevant physical and moisture-related characteristics. Comparing multiple MCC batches, grades or suppliers can be particularly informative because correlations between excipient characteristics and API degradation can help identify the material attribute responsible for the observed stability difference.
The objective is not simply to demonstrate that two MCC materials are analytically different. It is to determine which difference is mechanistically relevant to the degradation pathway of the drug substance. This problem-oriented approach can provide information beyond routine pharmacopoeial testing and support root-cause investigations, excipient selection, supplier qualification, formulation development and the mitigation of excipient-related drug product stability problems.
Be in control of your product!
When Is Additional MCC Characterization Useful?
Pharmacopoeial testing establishes whether an MCC material complies with defined compendial quality requirements. However, these requirements do not necessarily characterize every material attribute that may be relevant to a specific pharmaceutical application. Additional characterization can be valuable when changing an MCC supplier, qualifying an alternative or second source, comparing nominally equivalent MCC grades or investigating batch-to-batch variability. It can also help investigate unexpected changes in compression, granulation, tablet hardness, friability, disintegration or dissolution.
A particularly important application is the investigation of drug product stability problems. When unexpected API degradation occurs, or when stability behaviour differs between MCC batches, grades or suppliers, characterization of residual carbohydrates, reducing components, oxidized cellulose structures and degradation products may help determine whether excipient-related reactivity is contributing to the observed difference. More detailed MCC characterization can also support formulation development, API–excipient compatibility investigations, reverse engineering of reference drug products and the identification of relevant material attributes for risk-based excipient specifications. The appropriate characterization strategy should be based on the specific pharmaceutical question and the function of MCC in the formulation. Not every possible MCC property needs to be measured in every investigation.
How Should MCC from Different Suppliers Be Compared?
Comparing certificates of analysis and confirming pharmacopoeial compliance is an important first step when evaluating MCC from different suppliers, but it may not provide a complete assessment of material comparability. For a formulation in which chemical stability is a concern, the comparison may need to include attributes associated with excipient reactivity, such as residual carbohydrates, reducing power, oxidized cellulose structures or relevant degradation products. For other products, physical attributes affecting processing and tablet performance may be more important.
A risk-based comparison can include:
1. Compendial and supplier specifications
Compare pharmacopoeial compliance, supplier specifications and available certificates of analysis.
2. Intended function in the formulation
Determine how MCC contributes to the drug product and which material attributes could potentially affect that function.
3. Relevant material attributes
Identify appropriate physical and chemical characteristics for comparative testing.
4. Targeted analytical characterization
Investigate relevant differences between suppliers, grades or batches using appropriate analytical techniques.
5. Pharmaceutical relevance
Assess whether observed differences could be relevant to manufacturing or drug product performance.
Analytical characterization can support an assessment of material comparability and functional equivalence, but the significance of identified differences ultimately needs to be considered in the context of the formulation and, where necessary, confirmed by drug product testing.
MCC Characterization at Excipia
Excipia provides problem-oriented characterization of microcrystalline cellulose, with particular expertise in excipient variability, reactive components and the investigation of excipient-related drug product stability problems. Rather than applying the same analytical package to every material, investigations can be designed around the pharmaceutical question that needs to be answered.
Examples include characterization of:
- chemical composition and residual carbohydrate components;
- polymer characteristics and molecular-weight-related properties;
- reducing substances and reactive components;
- degradation products and process-related impurities;
- relevant differences between suppliers, grades or batches.
This approach can support supplier comparison and qualification, formulation troubleshooting, excipient variability investigations and pharmaceutical reverse engineering. Investigations can be designed to determine whether differences between MCC grades, batches or suppliers may explain differences observed during drug product stability studies.
Case Study: Xylose as a Marker of MCC Variability
Residual carbohydrate components can provide useful information when comparing microcrystalline cellulose from different sources. In an Excipia investigation of MCC variability, differences in xylose-related components were observed between MCC materials. Xylose is associated with residual hemicellulose-derived material and can therefore provide information about differences in raw-material source and/or manufacturing history.
The case demonstrates an important principle in excipient characterization: materials that meet established specifications may contain additional analytical information that can help distinguish between sources and support the investigation of excipient variability.
Read the case study: Variability of Excipients – Xylose in Microcrystalline Cellulose
Frequently Asked Questions About Microcrystalline Cellulose
Can two pharmacopoeially compliant MCC grades still be different?
Yes. Pharmacopoeial specifications establish important quality requirements but do not necessarily control every material attribute relevant to a specific formulation. MCC materials meeting the same monograph may still differ in particle characteristics, degree of polymerization, moisture behaviour, crystallinity, residual carbohydrate components and other properties.
Can microcrystalline cellulose contribute to API degradation?
MCC is generally considered a relatively inert excipient, but low levels of reactive components such as reducing carbohydrates, oxidized cellulose structures or process-related degradation products may become relevant for chemically susceptible APIs. Whether these components contribute to degradation depends on the specific formulation and should be investigated on a case-by-case basis.
Why can API stability differ between MCC suppliers?
MCC materials from different suppliers can comply with the same pharmacopoeial requirements while differing in low-level chemical and physical attributes. For a sensitive API, differences in residual carbohydrates, reducing components, oxidized cellulose structures or other process-related components may potentially contribute to differences observed during stability studies.
What should be compared when changing MCC supplier?
The appropriate comparison depends on the function of MCC in the formulation. In addition to pharmacopoeial compliance, potentially relevant characteristics can include particle properties, degree of polymerization, moisture-related properties, crystallinity, composition and reactive components. A risk-based assessment should determine which characteristics are relevant to the specific drug product.
Can MCC variability affect tablet dissolution?
Potentially. Differences in MCC attributes can influence tablet properties such as compactability, porosity, hardness and disintegration. Depending on the formulation, these differences may consequently contribute to differences in drug dissolution.
Why can MCC from different suppliers behave differently?
Differences in cellulose source, purification, hydrolysis, drying, milling and other manufacturing conditions can result in differences in the physical and chemical characteristics of MCC, even between nominally equivalent grades.
Is pharmacopoeial testing sufficient when changing MCC supplier?
Pharmacopoeial testing establishes compendial compliance but does not necessarily demonstrate functional equivalence for a specific drug product. Depending on the role of MCC in the formulation and the associated risk, additional comparative characterization and/or drug product testing may be appropriate.
Microcrystalline Cellulose Characterization and Supplier Comparison
Understanding excipient variability can be important when changing MCC suppliers, investigating unexpected drug product behaviour or comparing pharmaceutical products.
Excipia combines excipient characterization with pharmaceutical analytical and formulation expertise to develop targeted investigations based on the specific problem rather than relying solely on routine specification testing.
Contact us to discuss MCC characterization, supplier comparison or an excipient-related formulation problem.
Microcrystalline Cellulose Characterization Services
Excipia is an independent contract service platform focused on the physicochemical characterization of pharmaceutical excipients and food ingredients such as microcrystalline cellulose; as a pure substance, as a raw material or when processed into and end products.
More than 25 years in the development of pharmaceutical formulations have taught us that the limited information available on an excipient Certificate of Analysis (CoA) often fails to explain observed product or excipient characteristics and that more in-depth knowledge of the actual chemical excipient composition is essential to meet and understand specific formulation challenges.
Over the past 15 years, Excipia analytical scientists have spent tens of thousands of hours developing unique, specific analytical and physicochemical methods with ingenious sample preparation techniques to characterize cellulose ans other pharmaceutical excipients.
In these years we have gained a lot of knowledge about many excipients, their properties and exact composition, the difference between batches, qualities, grades, and manufacturers, how to quantify them in medicines and how they can best be used in a formulation.
Excipia offers fast and flexible hands-on microcrystalline cellulose characterization services to reveal and compare hidden microcrystalline cellulose properties like:
- the presence of potential reactive microcrystalline cellulose impurities or functional groups,
- reducing power of microcrystalline cellulose,
- microcrystalline cellulose degradation products and related substances,
- microcrystalline cellulose molecular weight distributions,
- and many other microcrystalline cellulose characteristics.
In addition, Excipia can help users of MCC to pick the most appropriate microcrystalline cellulose manufacturer, select the most suitable microcrystalline cellulose grade for their finished dosage form, or define customized microcrystalline cellulose specifications to control product performance, quality and safety.
Welcome to Excipia, a service platform of Avivia, dedicated to the composition, quality and quantity of excipients in medicinal products.
Discover our unique services such as quantitative excipient analysis, identification, selection or specific formulation development support. Don’t forget to check out our case studies.
Feel free to contact us using the “Contact” button or by sending a message to Excipia@avivia.nl.
Menno Wiltink
Founder of Excipia.